Response to Comment by Genthon Et Al. On “Surface Air Relative Humidities Spuriously Exceeding 100% in CMIP5 Model Output and Their Impact on Future Projections”

Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
doi 10.1029/2018jd028680
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Related search

Surface Air Relative Humidities Spuriously Exceeding 100% in CMIP5 Model Output and Their Impact on Future Projections

Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
2017English

Comment on “Surface Air Relative Humidities Spuriously Exceeding 100% in CMIP5 Model Output and Their Impact on Future Projections” by Ruosteenoja, Jylhä, Rälsänen and Mäkelä [2017]

Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
2018English

Response to ‘Comment on ‘‘Massive’ Metformin Overdose’ by Chiew Et Al. ’

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Pharmacology
2018English

Response to the Comment by Moodley Et Al.

Marine Ecology - Progress Series
EvolutionEcologySystematicsAquatic ScienceBehavior
1996English

Response To: Immortal Time Bias: Comment on the Article by Gwinnutt Et Al

Arthritis and Rheumatology
RheumatologyAllergyImmunology
2017English

Reply to Comment on “Ground vs. Surface Air Temperature Trends: Implications for Borehole Surface Temperature Reconstructions” by D. Chapman Et Al.

Geophysical Research Letters
EarthPlanetary SciencesGeophysics
2004English

Response to Comment on Chong Et Al. On Diabetes Reversal in NOD Mice

Science
MultidisciplinaryPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
2006English

Multi-Model Evidence for an Atmospheric Circulation Response to Arctic Sea Ice Loss in the CMIP5 Future Projections

Geophysical Research Letters
EarthPlanetary SciencesGeophysics
2018English

Comment on Study by Perkins Et Al.

Diabetes Care
Internal MedicineEndocrinologyAdvancedMetabolismSpecialized NursingDiabetes
2002English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy