Does ‘Mapping’ the Evidence Usefully Inform the Research Question Prioritisation Process in Systematic Reviews?

Trials - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/1745-6215-16-s2-p170
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Reconceptualising Stroke Research to Inform the Question of Anaesthetic Neurotoxicity

British Journal of Anaesthesia
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2018English

Conducting Systematic Reviews to Inform Occupational Therapy Practice

American Journal of Occupational Therapy
MedicineOccupational Therapy
2009English

Mapping of the Evidence From Systematic Reviews of the Cochrane Collaboration for Decision-Making Within Physiotherapy

Sao Paulo Medical Journal
Medicine
2013English

Systematic Reviews in Educational Research

2020English

Does Indigenous Health Research Have Impact? A Systematic Review of Reviews

International Journal for Equity in Health
Health PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2017English

Systematic Reviews and Research Waste

The Lancet
Medicine
2016English

An Overview of Systematic Reviews to Inform the Institutional Design of Scientific Advisory Committees

Global Challenges
2018English

The Challenges of Systematic Reviews of Educational Research

BMJ
2005English

The Evidence for Nursing Interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nurse researcher
TheoryResearch
2004English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy