Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
The Importance of Conventional Radiography and Ultrasound in Determining Bone Age
Orthopedic Research Online Journal
doi 10.31031/oproj.2018.04.000585
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
September 24, 2018
Authors
GL Meena
Publisher
Crimson Publishers
Related search
Comparing the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography,Digital Intraoral Radiography and Conventional Intraoral Radiography in the Measurement of Periodontal Bone Defects
Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences
Digital Luminescence Radiography and Conventional Radiography in Abdominal Contrast Examinations
Acta Radiologica
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology
Ultrasound Technology
Radiological
Imaging
Medicine
Otolith Shape and Size: The Importance of Age When Determining Indices for Fish-Stock Separation
Fisheries Research
Aquatic Science
Selenium-Based Digital Radiography Versus Conventional Film-Screen Radiography of the Hands and Feet: A Subjective Comparison.
American Journal of Roentgenology
Medicine
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology
Imaging
Comparison of Conventional Radiography and Digital Radiography in Regular and Reversal Image Modes for Detection of Periapical Pathology Using Intraoral Periapical Radiographs and Alveolar Bone Loss Depth Using Bitewing Radiographs.
International Journal of Advanced Research
5. Comparison of Degitalaized Mass Survey & Conventional Radiography
Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi
Medicine
141. Detection of Bone Egde in Computed Radiography
Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi
Medicine
Trauma Ultrasound Examination Versus Chest Radiography in the Detection of Hemothorax
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography
Radiological
Radiology
Nuclear Medicine
Ultrasound Technology
Imaging
Can We Get a Good Radiocarbon Age From “Bad Bone”? Determining the Reliability of Radiocarbon Age From Bioapatite
Radiocarbon
Archeology
Planetary Sciences
Earth
