Comparison of CPR Quality and Rescuer Fatigue Between Standard 30:2 CPR and Chest Compression-Only CPR: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Trial

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/s13049-014-0059-x
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Chest-Compression-Only Versus Standard CPR

The Lancet
Medicine
2011English

Compression-Only CPR or Standard CPR in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

New England Journal of Medicine
Medicine
2010English

Effect of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome on Bystander Willingness to Perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)–Is Compression–Only Preferred to Standard CPR?

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
Emergency NursingEmergency Medicine
2007English

Decontamination of an HIV-contaminated CPR Manikin.

American Journal of Public Health
EnvironmentalPublic HealthOccupational Health
1992English

Improved Chest Recoil Using an Adhesive Glove Device for Active Compression–decompression CPR in a Pediatric Manikin Model

Resuscitation
Emergency NursingEmergency MedicineCardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2009English

Interposed Abdominal Compression CPR for an Out-ofHospital Cardiac Arrest Victim Failing Traditional CPR

Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
MedicineEmergency Medicine
2015English

CPR I 30 Frgm. I Wiederentdeckt

Chronique d'Egypte
ArcheologyHistory
1982English

Factors Associated With Quality of Bystander CPR: The Presence of Multiple Rescuers and Bystander-Initiated CPR Without Instruction

Resuscitation
Emergency NursingEmergency MedicineCardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2014English

CPR Unit Corrections

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Medicine
1981English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy