(PDF) Table S2: The Presence (+) or Absence (−) of

Table S2: The Presence (+) or Absence (−) of Significant Differences at P ≤ 0.05 (ANOSIM) in Predicted Functions of Gut Bacterial Community at Level 1, 2, and 3 Between C. Lavaretus Pidschian and C. Lavaretus Pravdinellus

doi 10.7717/peerj.8005/supp-6

Full Text

Open PDF

Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Table S5B: The Pairwise Comparisons of Different Parts of Gut (Mucosa and Content Together) for C. L. Pidschian and C. L. Pravdinellus¥C. L. Pidschian /C. L. Pravdinellus

English

Figure 3: Composition of Microbiota at the Genus Level in Stomach Mucosa of C. L. Pidschian (A) and C. L. Pravdinellus (B).

English

Table S5A: The Effect (ADONIS) of Parts of Gut and Sample Type (Mucosa or Content) on C. L. Pidschian and C. L. Pravdinellus Microbiota

English

Table S7: Pairwise Comparisons for Content From Different Parts of Gut of C. L. Pidschian and C. L. Pravdinellus

English

Figure 6: Composition of Microbiota at the Genus Level in Intestinal Content of C. L. Pidschian (A) and C. L. Pravdinellus (B).

English

Figure 1: Phylum Composition of Microbiota From Gut Mucosa of C. L. Pidschian (A) and C. L. Pravdinellus (B).

English

Figure 4: Composition of Microbiota at the Genus Level in Stomach Content of C. L. Pidschian (A) and C. L. Pravdinellus (B).

English

Table S6A: Results of the Effect (ADONIS) of Forms and Part of Gut for Mucosa and Content on C. L. Pidschian and C. L. Pravdinellus Microbiota

English

Table S4: Results of Pairwise Comparisons of C. L. Pidschian and C.l. Pravdinellus Content From Different Parts of Gut, Environmental Compartments, and Prey

English

Amanote Research

Table S2: The Presence (+) or Absence (−) of Significant Differences at P ≤ 0.05 (ANOSIM) in Predicted Functions of Gut Bacterial Community at Level 1, 2, and 3 Between C. Lavaretus Pidschian and C. Lavaretus Pravdinellus

doi 10.7717/peerj.8005/supp-6

Full Text

Abstract

Date

Authors

Publisher

Related search

Table S5B: The Pairwise Comparisons of Different Parts of Gut (Mucosa and Content Together) for C. L. Pidschian and C. L. Pravdinellus¥C. L. Pidschian /C. L. Pravdinellus

Figure 3: Composition of Microbiota at the Genus Level in Stomach Mucosa of C. L. Pidschian (A) and C. L. Pravdinellus (B).

Table S5A: The Effect (ADONIS) of Parts of Gut and Sample Type (Mucosa or Content) on C. L. Pidschian and C. L. Pravdinellus Microbiota

Table S7: Pairwise Comparisons for Content From Different Parts of Gut of C. L. Pidschian and C. L. Pravdinellus

Figure 6: Composition of Microbiota at the Genus Level in Intestinal Content of C. L. Pidschian (A) and C. L. Pravdinellus (B).

Figure 1: Phylum Composition of Microbiota From Gut Mucosa of C. L. Pidschian (A) and C. L. Pravdinellus (B).

Figure 4: Composition of Microbiota at the Genus Level in Stomach Content of C. L. Pidschian (A) and C. L. Pravdinellus (B).

Table S6A: Results of the Effect (ADONIS) of Forms and Part of Gut for Mucosa and Content on C. L. Pidschian and C. L. Pravdinellus Microbiota

Table S4: Results of Pairwise Comparisons of C. L. Pidschian and C.l. Pravdinellus Content From Different Parts of Gut, Environmental Compartments, and Prey