Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Unconscious Bias in the Selection and Interpretation of Data on Sex and Burnout – Authors' Reply

Lancet Respiratory Medicine,The - United Kingdom
doi 10.1016/s2213-2600(19)30223-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
PulmonaryRespiratory Medicine
Date

August 1, 2019

Authors
Karen E A BurnsEllen L BurnhamPeter M DodekMarc Moss
Publisher

Elsevier BV


Related search

Unconscious Bias in the Selection and Interpretation of Data on Sex and Burnout

Lancet Respiratory Medicine,The
PulmonaryRespiratory Medicine
2019English

Interpretation, Communication, and Mechanisms of Associations Between Injectable Contraception and HIV Risk – Authors' Reply

The Lancet HIV
EpidemiologyInfectious DiseasesImmunologyVirology
2015English

Unconscious Bias: What Is Yours?

Journal of Transcultural Nursing
Nursing
2017English

Selection on Sex-Ratio and the Evolution of Sex-Determination

Heredity
Genetics
1975English

Optimal Patient Selection for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy – Authors' Reply

The Lancet Oncology
Oncology
2019English

The Authors Reply

Critical Care Medicine
Critical CareIntensive Care Medicine
2016English

Comments on Authors' Reply

2019English

The Authors Reply

Kidney International
Nephrology
2012English

The Authors Reply

Critical Care Medicine
Critical CareIntensive Care Medicine
2014English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy