Figure 4: Means ± One Between-Subjects Standard Deviation for Peak (A), Loading Rate (B), and Impulse (C) of the Medial Knee Joint Contact Force for the Transtibial Subjects (TTA), the Transfemoral Subjects (TFA), and the Control Subjects.

doi 10.7717/peerj.2960/fig-4
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Standard Automated Perimetry Versus Matrix Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry in Subjects With Ocular Hypertension and Healthy Control Subjects

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2013English

Figure 5: Comparisons of Means and Standard Deviations of MVC EMG of All Subjects During the Static Steady State.

English

The Wandering Subjects of the Levant

Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics
LinguisticsLanguage
2016English

Virtual Subjects: Using the Internet as an Alternative Source of Subjects and Research Environment

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
1997English

Curriculum and the Production of Indigenous Subjects

Acta Scientiarum. Education
2015English

Table S1: Metadata of Infant Subjects Subjects

English

Collective Subjects as a Special Kinds of Subjects of Right

Constitutional State
2018English

Analysis of Joint Angle and Upper and Lower Thigh Rotation Movements in the Stance Phase of Walking by Subjects With Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

Rigakuryoho Kagaku
Physical TherapySports TherapyRehabilitation
2014English

A Comparison of Within-Subjects and Between-Subjects Designs in Studies With Discrete-Time Survival Outcomes

Open Journal of Statistics
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy