Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews

PLoS Medicine - United States
doi 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040078
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Related search

Epidemiology, Quality and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Traditional Chinese Medicine Interventions Published in Chinese Journals

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2011English

Does Updating Improve the Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews?

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2006English

PRISMA Harms Checklist: Improving Harms Reporting in Systematic Reviews

British Medical Journal
Medicine
2016English

The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: A Systematic Review

Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology
2017English

Quality of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Surgical Randomized Clinical Trials

BJS open
Surgery
2020English

Identifying Approaches for Assessing Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews: A Descriptive Study

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2017English

Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture: The PRISMA for Acupuncture Checklist

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
MedicineAlternative MedicineComplementary
2019English

Impact of Librarians on Reporting of the Literature Searching Component of Pediatric Systematic Reviews

Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
MedicineInformation SciencesLibraryHealth Informatics
2017English

Time Relevance, Citation of Reporting Guidelines, and Breadth of Literature Search in Systematic Reviews in Orthodontics

European Journal of Orthodontics
Orthodontics
2014English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy