Effect of Open Peer Review on Quality of Reviews and on Reviewers' Recommendations: A Randomised Trial

BMJ
doi 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.23
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

BMJ

Related search

Open Peer Review: A Randomised Controlled Trial

British Journal of Psychiatry
MedicinePsychiatryMental Health
2000English

Survey on Open Peer Review: Attitudes and Experience Amongst Editors, Authors and Reviewers

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2017English

A Model to Explain Quality Improvement Effect of Peer Reviews

IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems
Electronic EngineeringPattern RecognitionHardwareComputer VisionElectricalArchitectureArtificial IntelligenceSoftware
2010English

Peer Review and Reviewers

Powder Diffraction
InstrumentationRadiationCondensed Matter PhysicsMaterials Science
1996English

Improving the Quality of Peer Review: Gga Instructions for Reviewers

Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging
2019English

A Scoping Review on the Roles and Tasks of Peer Reviewers in the Manuscript Review Process in Biomedical Journals

BMC Medicine
Medicine
2019English

The Effect of Mindfulness on Academic Self-Efficacy: A Randomised Controlled Trial

International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling
2019English

Effect of Antenatal Peer Support on Breastfeeding Initiation: A Systematic Review

CMAJ
Medicine
2010English

What Is Open Peer Review? A Systematic Review

F1000Research
GeneticsMolecular BiologyPharmacologyBiochemistryMicrobiology ImmunologyMedicineToxicologyPharmaceutics
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy