Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 1: Impact of Digital Video Data Stream Compression on (A) Processing Time of Animal Tracking, (B) Computed Average Animal Distance Moved and (C) Computed Average Animal Velocity.
doi 10.7717/peerj.7367/fig-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 2: Impact of Digital Video File Resolution on (A) Processing Time (B) Computed Average Animal Distance Moved, (C) Computed Average Animal Velocity and (D) Reconstruction of Animal Trajectories.
Figure 3: Impact of Transcoded and Native Video File Frame Rates on Average Processing Time of Animal Tracking (A, D) and Computed Parameter of Average Animal Distance Moved (B, E). Graphical Representation of Reconstructed Animal Trajectories (C) Demonstrates Significant Loss of Data When Video Files With Transcoded Frame Rates Are Employed for Animal Tracking.
Dry Coupling for Whole-Body Small-Animal Photoacoustic Computed Tomography
Journal of Biomedical Optics
Electronic
Optics
Molecular Physics,
Optical
Biomaterials
Atomic
Magnetic Materials
Biomedical Engineering
Figure 4: Impact of Background Subtraction Techniques on Accuracy of Animal Tracking and Quantitative Behavioural Endpoints.
Radio Tracking and Animal Populations
Auk
Evolution
Ecology
Systematics
Animal Science
Behavior
Zoology
Radio Tracking and Animal Populations
Optimizing Marine Spatial Plans With Animal Tracking Data
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Evolution
Ecology
Systematics
Aquatic Science
Behavior
Pathtrackr: An R Package for Video Tracking and Analysing Animal Movement
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Ecological Modeling
Ecology
Systematics
Evolution
Behavior
Evaluation of a Cone Beam Computed Tomography Geometry for Image Guided Small Animal Irradiation
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiological
Radiology
Nuclear Medicine
Ultrasound Technology
Imaging
