Inconsistency in Aortic Stenosis Severity Between CT and Echocardiography: Prevalence and Insights Into Mechanistic Differences Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Open Heart - United Kingdom
doi 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001044
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

BMJ

Related search

Grading of Aortic Stenosis Severity: A Head-To-Head Comparison Between Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography

Radiologia Medica
MedicineNuclear MedicineRadiologyImaging
2018English

Aortic Stenosis - New Insights in Stenosis Progression and in Prevention

2011English

Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity Using Intelligent Phonocardiography

International Journal of Cardiology
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2015English

Echocardiogram for Aortic Valve Stenosis, the Complex Interplay Between Flow and Gradient and Insight Into Stress Echocardiography and Transoesophageal Echo for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences
2016English

Three-Year Outcome After Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty. Insights Into Prognosis of Valvular Aortic Stenosis

Circulation
Cardiovascular MedicinePhysiologyCardiology
1994English

Flight Dynamics Mode Identification and Model Reduction Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

2016English

Left Ventricular Ejection Dynamics in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Aortic Stenosis: Comparison With the Use of Doppler Echocardiography

Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography
RadiologicalRadiologyNuclear MedicineUltrasound TechnologyImaging
1987English

Computational Fluid Dynamics.

2012English

Verification and Validation in Computational Fluid Dynamics

Progress in Aerospace Sciences
Mechanics of MaterialsMechanical EngineeringAerospace Engineering
2002English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy