2D Versus 3D Real Time Ultrasound With Live xPlane Imaging to Visualize Aortic and Ductal Arches: Comparison Between Methods

PeerJ - United States
doi 10.7717/peerj.4561
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Table 5: Feasibilty of 2D Ultrasound vs. Live xPlane According to Operator Level.

English

A Comparison of Iterative 2d-3d Pose Estimation Methods for Real-Time Applications

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer ScienceTheoretical Computer Science
2009English

Surgical Navigation System Using Intraoperative Real-Time 3D Ultrasound Imaging for Fetal Surgery

Journal of Japan Society of Computer Aided Surgery
2011English

Real-Time Ellipsometry-Based Transmission Ultrasound Imaging

2007English

Development of the Fetal Vermis: New Biometry Reference Data and Comparison of 3 Diagnostic Modalities-3d Ultrasound, 2D Ultrasound, and MR Imaging

American Journal of Neuroradiology
MedicineNuclear MedicineNeurologyImagingRadiology
2016English

Real-Time 2-D Temperature Imaging Using Ultrasound

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Biomedical Engineering
2010English

Spatio-Temporal Registration of Real Time 3D Ultrasound to Cardiovascular MR Sequences

English

AB316. SPR-43 Comparison of Bladder Volumes Between 2D and 3D Ultrasound Calculations and Urodynamic Measurements in Women With Overactive Bladder (OAB)

Translational Andrology and Urology
Reproductive MedicineUrology
2016English

“Gold Standard” Data for Evaluation and Comparison of 3d/2d Registration Methods

Computer Aided Surgery
2004English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy