Table 2: Mean (±SD) Time (Seconds) and Mean Number of Steps to Reach the Location That Participants Were Looking Ahead To.

doi 10.7717/peerj.8838/table-2

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Table 2: Pharmacokinetic Parameters of HX0969W and Fospropofol (Mean ± SD).

English

Table 1: Participant Anthropometric Characteristics (Mean ± SD).

English

Table 3: Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Propofol (Mean ± SD).

English

Table 3: Mean (SD) for Mean and Peak RER Results for Sets, Rest Periods, and Averages.

English

Table 2: Mean ± SD in AP and ML COP Outcome Measures for Posture Trials.

English

Table 1: Descriptive Characteristics for the Sample (Values as Mean (SD).

English

The Mean Waiting Time to a Repetition

Advances in Applied Probability

English

Table 2: Geometric Mean of Ranking Values.

English

Challenging the Mean Time to Failure: Measuring Dependability as a Mean Failure Cost

2009

English

Amanote Research

Table 2: Mean (±SD) Time (Seconds) and Mean Number of Steps to Reach the Location That Participants Were Looking Ahead To.

Full Text

Abstract

Date

Authors

Publisher

Related search

Table 2: Pharmacokinetic Parameters of HX0969W and Fospropofol (Mean ± SD).

Table 1: Participant Anthropometric Characteristics (Mean ± SD).

Table 3: Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Propofol (Mean ± SD).

Table 3: Mean (SD) for Mean and Peak RER Results for Sets, Rest Periods, and Averages.

Table 2: Mean ± SD in AP and ML COP Outcome Measures for Posture Trials.

Table 1: Descriptive Characteristics for the Sample (Values as Mean (SD).

The Mean Waiting Time to a Repetition

Table 2: Geometric Mean of Ranking Values.

Challenging the Mean Time to Failure: Measuring Dependability as a Mean Failure Cost