Treatment Time, Outcome, and Anchorage Loss Comparisons of Self-Ligating and Conventional Brackets

Angle Orthodontist - United States
doi 10.2319/041912-326.1
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation)

Related search

Frictional Characteristics of Active Self-Ligating Brackets Versus Conventional Brackets

Egyptian Orthodontic Journal
2010English

Stability of Treatment With Self-Ligating Brackets and Conventional Brackets in Adolescents: A Long-Term Follow-Up Retrospective Study

Head and Face Medicine
MedicineOtorhinolaryngologyNeurologyDentistry
2014English

Self-Ligating Brackets in Orthodontics

Angle Orthodontist
MedicineOrthodontics
2010English

Evaluation of Force Released by Deflection of Orthodontic Wires in Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets

Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Oral SurgeryOrthodontics
2016English

Antimicrobial Action of Chlorhexidine Digluconate in Self-Ligating and Conventional Metal Brackets Infected With Streptococcus Mutans Biofilm

Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry
Dentistry
2018English

Comparison of Self-Ligating Damon3 and Conventional MBT Brackets Regarding Alignment Efficiency and Pain Experience: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
Dentistry
2019English

Evaluation of the Force Generated by Gradual Deflection of Orthodontic Wires in Conventional Metallic, Esthetic, and Self-Ligating Brackets

Journal of Applied Oral Science
MedicineDentistry
2016English

Effect of Different Ligation Designs of Self-Ligating Orthodontic Brackets on Friction

Egyptian Orthodontic Journal
2013English

A Case of Non-Extraction Treatment With Self-Ligating Brackets, Angle Cl. I With Crowding Case

Dental Medicine Research
2013English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy