Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Unexpected Sounds Non-Selectively Inhibit Active Visual Stimulus Representations

doi 10.1101/2020.04.16.044966
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

April 18, 2020

Authors
Cheol SohJan R. Wessel
Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory


Related search

Active Sensing for Dynamic, Non-Holonomic, Robust Visual Servoing

2014English

Auditory Sketches: Very Sparse Representations of Sounds Are Still Recognizable

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2016English

Table 1: Characteristics of Sounds Used to Assemble Stimulus Sequences.

English

Learned Changes in Stimulus Representations (A Personal History)

Spanish Journal of Psychology
LinguisticsPsychologyLanguage
2007English

New Candidaspongiolides, Tedanolide Analogues That Selectively Inhibit Melanoma Cell Growth

Organic Letters
BiochemistryOrganic ChemistryTheoretical ChemistryPhysical
2011English

Cell-Penetrating Peptides Selectively Targeting SMAD3 Inhibit Profibrotic TGF-β Signaling

Journal of Clinical Investigation
Medicine
2017English

Pairing Speech Sounds With Vagus Nerve Stimulation Drives Stimulus-Specific Cortical Plasticity

Brain Stimulation
NeuroscienceNeurologyBiophysics
2015English

Visual Mismatch Negativity and Stimulus-Specific Adaptation: The Role of Stimulus Complexity

Experimental Brain Research
Neuroscience
2019English

Sounds of Waitakere: Using Practitioner Research to Explore How Year 6 Recorder Players Compose Responses to Visual Representations of a Natural Environment

British Journal of Music Education
EducationMusic
2011English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy