Comparison of Two Maxillary Protraction Protocols: Tooth-Borne Versus Bone-Anchored Protraction Facemask Treatment

Progress in Orthodontics
doi 10.1186/s40510-015-0096-7
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

The Effect of Bone Anchored Maxillary Protraction on Maxillary- Mandibular Divergency

Egyptian Orthodontic Journal
2014English

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Changes Associated With Bone Anchored Maxillary Protraction

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Orthodontics
2011English

Evaluation of Treatment and Posttreatment Changes of Protraction Facemask Treatment Using the PAR Index

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Orthodontics
2000English

Maxillary Protraction With Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Facemask Versus Skeletal Anchorage With Mini-Implants in Class III Patients: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial

Progress in Orthodontics
2019English

Mandibular and Glenoid Fossa Changes After Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction Therapy in Patients With UCLP: A 3-D Preliminary Assessment

Angle Orthodontist
MedicineOrthodontics
2016English

RPE and Orthodontic Protraction Facemask as an Alternative Therapy for Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Associated With Maxillary Hypoplasia

Journal of Dental Sleep Medicine
2016English

Correlation Between Skeletal Changes by Maxillary Protraction and Upper Airway Dimensions

Angle Orthodontist
MedicineOrthodontics
2011English

Effects of Maxillary Protraction and Fixed Appliance Therapy on the Pharyngeal Airway

Angle Orthodontist
MedicineOrthodontics
2009English

Comparison of the Effects on the Pharyngeal Airway Space of Maxillary Protraction Appliances According to the Methods of Anchorage

Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy