Comparing SWAT With SWAT-MODFLOW Hydrological Simulations When Assessing the Impacts of Groundwater Abstractions for Irrigation and Drinking Water

doi 10.5194/hess-2019-232-ac1
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Copernicus GmbH

Related search

Can We Trust Eucalyptus Simulations From SWAT?

2019English

Calibration and Validation of the Swat Hydrological Model for the Mucuri River Basin

Engenharia Agricola
AgriculturalBiological Sciences
2018English

Application of GPR Based SWAT-MODFLOW Model’s Coupling Calculation in Xi’an Heihe River Basin

Journal of Water Resources Research
2015English

A Coupled Model Simulation and Application of Swat-Modflow Based on the Technology of GPR

Journal of Water Resources Research
2014English

Improved Simulation of River Water and Groundwater Exchange in an Alluvial Plain Using the SWAT Model

Hydrological Processes
Water ScienceTechnology
2015English

Advances in Water Resources Assessment With SWAT—an Overview

Hydrological Sciences Journal
Water ScienceTechnology
2015English

The Impact of Land Use on Hydrological Characteristics and Erosion Rate of Cilutung Watershed With SWAT Model

E3S Web of Conferences
EarthEnergyPlanetary SciencesEnvironmental Science
2018English

Assessing the Difference Between Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Simulated Pre-Development and Observed Developed Loading Regimes

Hydrology
OceanographyWaste ManagementDisposalEarth-Surface ProcessesTechnologyWater Science
2018English

Assessment of NASA’s Physiographic and Meteorological Datasets as Input to HSPF and SWAT Hydrological Models

Advances in Geospatial Technologies
2013English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy