Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Computational Methods for Comparison of Large Genomic and Proteomic Datasets Reveal Protein Markers of Metastatic Cancer
doi 10.1021/pr050390u.s001
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Related search
Comparison of Density Estimation Methods for Astronomical Datasets
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
Astronomy
Planetary Science
Space
iTRAQ Quantitative Proteomic Comparison of Metastatic and Non-Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Tumors
PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
Reportsites - A Computational Method to Extract Positional and Physico-Chemical Information From Large-Scale Proteomic Post-Translational Modification Datasets
Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics
Integrated Proteomic and Glycoproteomic Analyses of Prostate Cancer Cells Reveal Glycoprotein Alteration in Protein Abundance and Glycosylation
Molecular and Cellular Proteomics
Biochemistry
Medicine
Analytical Chemistry
Molecular Biology
Comparative Proteomic Analysis Identifies Exosomal Eps8 Protein as a Potential Metastatic Biomarker for Pancreatic Cancer
Oncology Reports
Medicine
Cancer Research
Oncology
Integrated Proteomic and Genomic Analysis of Gastric Cancer Patient Tissues
Journal of Proteome Research
Biochemistry
Chemistry
P04: Saliva: Hub of Plausible Ovarian Cancer Proteomic Markers
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology
Gynecology
Reproductive Medicine
Immunology
Obstetrics
Allergy
Comparative Genomic Hybridizations Reveal Absence of Large Streptomyces Coelicolor Genomic Islands in Streptomyces Lividans
BMC Genomics
Biotechnology
Genetics
Computational Methods for Protein Structure Prediction and Modeling
Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering
