What Factors Are Associated With the Poor Prognosis of Anal Adenocarcinoma Compared With Low-Lying Rectal Adenocarcinoma Based on a Population Analysis: A Propensity Score Matching Study

PLoS ONE - United States
doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0219937
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Related search

P3.03-23 a Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study on Prognosis of the Diversity of MUC1 Expression in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma

Journal of Thoracic Oncology
MedicineOncologyRespiratory MedicinePulmonary
2018English

SIRT1 Expression Is Associated With Poor Prognosis of Lung Adenocarcinoma

OncoTargets and Therapy
OncologyPharmacology
2015English

Identification of Novel Genes Associated With a Poor Prognosis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma via a Bioinformatics Analysis

Bioscience Reports
BiochemistryCell BiologyMolecular BiologyBiophysics
2019English

Long-Term Urinary Tract Effect of Ileal Conduit After Radical Cystectomy Compared With Bladder Preservation: A Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study With Propensity Score-Matching Analysis

BMJ Open
Medicine
2018English

Prognosis and Risk Factors in Older Patients With Lung Cancer and Pulmonary Embolism: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Scientific Reports
Multidisciplinary
2020English

A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer in a Population-Based Study

Colorectal Disease
Gastroenterology
2019English

Methylation of MGMT Is Associated With Poor Prognosis in Patients With Stage III Duodenal Adenocarcinoma

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2016English

Reduced Expression of Uroplakin 1A Is Associated With the Poor Prognosis of Gastric Adenocarcinoma Patients

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2014English

Poor Prognosis of Gastric Adenocarcinoma With Decreased Expression of AHRR

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2012English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy