A Comparison of American, Norwegian, and Russian Standards in Calculating the Wall Thickness of Submarine Gas Pipeline

Makara Journal of Technology
doi 10.7454/mst.v20i1.3287
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Universitas Indonesia, Directorate of Research and Public Service

Related search

Norwegian–Russian Political Relations and Barents Oil and Gas Developments

2015English

Robotic Pipeline Wall Thickness Evaluation for Dense Nondestructive Testing Inspection

Journal of Field Robotics
ControlSystems EngineeringComputer Science Applications
2018English

Comparison of the Josephson Voltage Standards of the Republic of Belarus and Russian Federation

Ukrainian Metrological Journal
2017English

Trend of the Environmental Supervision on Submarine Pipeline Installation

Environmental Science and Pollution Research
MutagenesisEnvironmental ChemistryHealthMedicineToxicologyPollution
2018English

Comparison of American, British, and German Standards for Metal Fits.

Technologic Papers of the Bureau of Standards
1927English

Maximal Left Ventricular Wall Thickness: A Comparison Between CMR and Echocardiography in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Nuclear MedicineRadiologyUltrasound TechnologyCardiologyFamily PracticeRadiologicalCardiovascular MedicineImaging
2013English

Checking Procedure of the Trieste (Italy) Submarine Pipeline by Transient Tests

2019English

The Affected Analysis of Pipeline Thermal Stress Under Different Support Conditions and Wall Thickness Based on Finite Element Simulation

Science Discovery
2017English

Russian Oil Pipeline Strategy

Studies in Regional Science
Social SciencesEnvironmental Science
2010English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy