Assessment of the Importance of Double-Blinding Should Be Based on Systematic Reviews: A Rebuttal

Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis - United Kingdom
doi 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03006.x
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Wiley

Related search

Systematic Reviews Should Not Be Assumed to Be Systematic and Comprehensive.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Epidemiology
2020English

Risk Compensation Theory Should Be Subject to Systematic Reviews of the Scientific Evidence

Injury Prevention
EnvironmentalPublic HealthOccupational Health
2001English

The Importance of Ambulatory Venous Hypertension Should Be Revised

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research
2019English

Which Information Sources Should Be Used to Identify Studies for Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations in Healthcare?

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2017English

Evaluation of Strategies for Increasing Transplantation Should Be Based on a Current and Precise Assessment of the State of Organ Donation

American Journal of Transplantation
TransplantationAllergyImmunologyPharmacology
2017English

Quality Assessment of Observational Studies for Systematic Reviews

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2013English

A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of the Rotator Cuff

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
OrthopedicsSports Medicine
2018English

Can Systematic Reviews With Sparse Data Be Trusted?

Anaesthesia
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2016English

Exploring the Importance of Online Reviews on Price

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
2020English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy