The Concept “God” (Case Study: Phraseological Units in the English, Russian, Tatar and Turkish Languages)

SHS Web of Conferences
doi 10.1051/shsconf/20196900019
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

EDP Sciences

Related search

Component Parts of Phraseological and Parameological Units With Ornytonym Component in the English, Russian and Tatar Languages

Journal of Social Sciences Research
ArtsFinanceHumanitiesEconomicsEconometricsSocial Sciences
2018English

English and Russian Somatic Phraseological Units: Differentiating Outcomes

International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering
Mechanics of MaterialsElectronic EngineeringCivilStructural EngineeringElectricalComputer Science
2019English

Phraseological Units With Onomastic Components: The Case of English and Slovene

RLA. Revista de lingüística teórica y aplicada
2014English

The Comparative Analysis of Onomatopoeic Units in Russian, English and Italian Languages

Language and Text
2015English

Structural-Semantic and Cognitive Features of Phraseological Units With Ornithonyms, Denoting Poultry in the German, English and Ukrainian Languages

Philological Review
2018English

Vectors of Ceremonial Phraseological Units Research in English

Bulletin of Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University
2019English

Origin and Significance of Color Perception in Kazakh Language Compared With Altai, Tatar, English and Russian Languages

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology
2018English

Motivational Factors in Multilingual Students' Learning Additional Languages: The Case of English and Turkish

Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics
LinguisticsEducationLanguageSocial Psychology
2018English

The Role of the Context in Translation of Phraseological Units (Based on Turkish Periodicals)

The Advanced Science Journal
2014English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy