How to Qualify the Debate on the Public Library by the Use of Research-Developed Tools

Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis
doi 10.1515/bfp-2018-0041
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Related search

Studying the Use of Public Spaces in the Library

Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI
2013English

The Role of 'Public Opinion' in the UK Animal Research Debate

Journal of Medical Ethics
ArtsHumanitiesLegal AspectsHealth PolicyHealthEthicsIssues
2009English

Sensemaking, Knowing and Storytelling: Making Sense of the Public Internet Access Policy Debate at the Ottawa Public Library

Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI
2013English

Crowding the Library: How and Why Libraries Are Using Crowdsourcing to Engage the Public

Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research
2019English

Institutional Research on Public Opinion and Participative Devices. From Polls to Public Debate

Revista Internacional de Sociologia
Social Sciences
2012English

Understanding the Role of Medical Experts During a Public Health Crisis Digital Tools and Library Resources for Research on the 1918 Spanish Influenza

2014English

Opening the Conversation: How Ontario Public Library Websites Frame Disability

Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI
2019English

The Perils of Public Debate

Nature Neuroscience
Neuroscience
2005English

The Policy Debate Over Public Investment in Comparative Effectiveness Research

Journal of General Internal Medicine
Internal Medicine
2009English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy