Extensions of the Probabilistic Ranking Metrics of Competing Treatments in Network Meta‐analysis to Reflect Clinically Important Relative Differences on Many Outcomes

Biometrical Journal - Germany
doi 10.1002/bimj.201900026
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Wiley

Related search

On a Probabilistic Model for Smoothing Discrete Ranking Quality Metrics

Machine Learning and Data Analysis
2016English

Network Meta-Analysis of Treatments for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2017English

Meta-Regression Models to Address Heterogeneity and Inconsistency in Network Meta-Analysis of Survival Outcomes

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2012English

No Effect of Nebulised Adrenaline on Clinically Important Outcomes in Viral Bronchiolitis

Thorax
PulmonaryRespiratory Medicine
2003English

Derivation of Decision Rules to Predict Clinically Important Outcomes in Acute Flank Pain Patients

American Journal of Emergency Medicine
MedicineEmergency Medicine
2017English

Total Knee Replacement; Minimal Clinically Important Differences and Responders

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Sports MedicineRheumatologyOrthopedicsBiomedical Engineering
2013English

Prm231 - Report of Network Meta-Analysis Geometry: A Systematic Review and Metrics Recommendation

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2018English

MT1 Impact of the Choice of Prior Distribution on Relative Effect Sizes Using Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2011English

Allowing for Informative Missingness in Aggregate Data Meta-Analysis With Continuous or Binary Outcomes: Extensions to Metamiss

Stata Journal
Mathematics
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy