Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 1: Correlation Between Feather Growth Rate (FGR) and Feather Length (FL) for All Four Studied Storm-Petrel Species.
doi 10.7717/peerj.7807/fig-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure S1: Inter-Annual Differences in Feather Length (FL) and Feather Growth Rate (FGR) for the Southern Storm-Petrel Species.
Table 2: Spearmans Rank Correlation Output for Correlations Between Feather Growth Rate (FGR) and Feather Length (FL) for Each Studied Species.
Figure S2: Relationship Between Daily Feather Growth Rate (FGR) and Feather Length (FL) for Non-Procellariiformes Reported in Literature
Table 1: Results of the Post-Hoc Dunn Test for Inter-Specific Differences in Feather Length (FL) and Feather Growth Rate (FGR) for Each Studied Species.
Table 3: Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares (PGLS) Models for Feather Growth Rate (FGR) Based on Feather Length (FL).
Table S2: Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares (PGLS) Models for Feather Growth Rate (FGR) Based on Feather Length (FL) Per Feather Type
Figure 3: Predicted Feather Growth Rates (FGR) and Their Residuals Based on the Optimized Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares (PGLS) Model for Individual Storm-Petrels.
Table 6: One-Sample Student’s T-Test Output of the Residuals of Feather Growth Rate (FGR) of Each Studied Species Predicted by the Optimized Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares (PGLS) Model.
Differences in Tail Feather Growth Rate in Storm-Petrels Breeding in the Northern and Southern Hemisphere: A Ptilochronological Approach
PeerJ
Genetics
Molecular Biology
Biochemistry
Biological Sciences
Medicine
Agricultural
Neuroscience
