Balancing Precision and Risk: Should Multiple Detection Methods Be Analyzed Separately in N-Mixture Models?

PLoS ONE - United States
doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0049410
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Related search

Decisions About Dialysis and Other Life-Sustaining Treatments Should Not Be Made Separately

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Nephrology
2014English

Balancing Obligations: Should Written Information About Life-Sustaining Treatment Be Neutral?

Journal of Medical Ethics
ArtsHumanitiesLegal AspectsHealth PolicyHealthEthicsIssues
2014English

Mixture Models of Choice Under Risk

2018English

How Should Risk Adjustment Data Be Collected?

Inquiry
Health Policy
2012English

Renal Insufficiency Should Be Included in Stroke Risk Scores

Kidney International
Nephrology
2013English

Gaussian Mixture Noise Improving Nonlinear Multiple Signal Detection

2013English

Increased Scrutiny of Climate-Change Models Should Be Welcomed

Nature
Multidisciplinary
2017English

Unsupervised Change Detection in Sar Images Using Gaussian Mixture Models

ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
2015English

Balancing Benefits and Harms in Health Care: Information About Benefits and Harms Should Be Accessible to Patients

BMJ
2004English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy