Third Party Citizen Reactions to Interventions in a Genocide: The Influence of the Social Categorization of Victims and the Norm of a Responsibility to Protect

doi 10.22215/etd/2013-09975
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors
Publisher

Carleton University

Related search

Beyond Rhetoric? Evaluating the Responsibility to Protect as a Norm of Humanitarian Intervention

Journal on the Use of Force and International Law
LawInternational RelationsPolitical Science
2018English

Rising Powers and the Responsibility to Protect: Will the Norm Survive in the Age of BRICS?

Global Affairs
2015English

A Special Responsibility to Protect: The UK, Australia and the Rise of Islamic State

International Affairs
SociologyInternational RelationsPolitical Science
2015English

The Legitimacy of “Responsibility to Protect” (R2p) in International Relations: A Conceptual Review

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
2019English

From Racism to Genocide: Anthropology in the Third Reich

Choice Reviews Online
2005English

The State of Responsibility to Protect Inception in ASEAN Regionalism

IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
2020English

Responsibility to Protect

2009English

France, Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect

2020English

Atrocity Crimes Framing the Responsibility to Protect

2009English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy