Gleason Misclassification Rate Is Independent of Number of Biopsy Cores in Systematic Biopsy

Urology - United States
doi 10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.089
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Urology
Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

Üroonkoloji Bülteni
2018English

To Biopsy, or Not to Biopsy: Is There Really a Question?

Annals of Surgical Oncology
OncologySurgery
2019English

Repeated Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: When and How Many Cores

Archivio Italiano di Urologia Andrologia
Urology
2014English

Can Systematic Biopsy Be Safely Avoided at the Time of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasonography Fusion Biopsy?

BJU International
Urology
2019English

Mp16-09 Comparison of Mri/Ultrasound-Fusion-Biopsy to Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Prediction of Final Histopathology in Prostatectomy Specimen

Journal of Urology
Urology
2016English

When Is Biopsy of the Stomach Ethical?

BMJ
1984English

Systematic Prostate Biopsy Before Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Japanese Journal of Urology
Urology
2004English

Identification of Gleason Pattern 5 on Prostatic Needle Core Biopsy: Frequency of Underdiagnosis and Relation to Morphology

International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
MedicineUrology
2011English

Is Day Case Liver Biopsy Underutilised?

Gut
Gastroenterology
1995English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy