Prm263 - The Use of Prisma Statement Improves the Reporting Quality of Meta-Analyses Published in the Field of Psychology

Value in Health - United Kingdom
doi 10.1016/j.jval.2018.09.2380
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Endorsement of PRISMA Statement and Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Published in Nursing Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study

BMJ Open
Medicine
2017English

Low Reporting Quality of the Meta-Analyses in Diagnostic Pathology

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
MedicineForensic MedicinePathologyMedical Laboratory Technology
2017English

The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: A Systematic Review

Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology
2017English

Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture: The PRISMA for Acupuncture Checklist

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
MedicineAlternative MedicineComplementary
2019English

Outcome Reporting Bias: A Pervasive Problem in Published Meta-Analyses

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Nephrology
2017English

Analysis of the Methodologic Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analyses in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research
2012English

Figure 1: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Flow Diagram (

English

The Effect of Clinical Interventions on Hospital Readmissions: A Meta-Review of Published Meta-Analyses

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
Health PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2013English

Erratum: Editorial. Methodology and Reporting of Meta-Analyses in the Neurosurgical Literature

Journal of Neurosurgery
SurgeryNeurology
2014English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy