PCR Evaluation of False-Positive Signals From Two Automated Blood-Culture Systems

Journal of Medical Microbiology - United Kingdom
doi 10.1099/jmm.0.46196-0
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Microbiology Society

Related search

Effect of Delay of Blood Cultures on Positive Detection by Automated Blood Culture System

Kansenshogaku zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases
Medicine
2004English

Performance Evaluation of Two Automated Quantitative Fecal Occult Blood Tests

Laboratory Medicine Online
2016English

Rapid Identification of Gram-Positive Pathogens and Their Resistance Genes From Positive Blood Culture Broth Using a Multiplex Tandem RT-PCR Assay

Journal of Medical Microbiology
MedicineMicrobiology
2013English

The False-Positive Rate of Automated Plagiarism Detection for SQL Assessments

2019English

Rapid Detection of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa From Positive Blood Cultures by Quantitative PCR

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
MedicineInfectious DiseasesMicrobiology
2010English

Evaluation of Automated Cell Culture Incubators

JALA: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Automation
2003English

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Therapy of Blood Culture Positive Healthcare-Associated Infections in Children

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2015English

Aerosolized Vaccine as an Unexpected Source of False-Positive Bordetella Pertussis PCR Results

Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Microbiology
2011English

Evaluation of Factors That May Cause False Positive Growth Signals in Blood Cultures-As the Word 'Factors' Will Include Both Microbial and Patients as Well as Others

International Journal of Clinical & Medical Microbiology
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy