Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Table 2: Clinical Features of the Five Cases With the Largest BA Deviation (≥2 Years) Between AI and the Reference Standard.

doi 10.7717/peerj.8854/table-2
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Figure 5: The Bland-Altman Plot Showing the Difference Between the AI BA and the Reference Standard.

English

Table S1: Mean and Standard Deviation of Measured Features for All Krill Aggregations (N = 2, 911)

English

Figure 3: The Accuracy of AI BA Determined by Comparing With the Reference Standard for Different Age Groups.

English

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for the 22 Physiographic and Climatic Variables, SD = Standard Deviation, N = 14.

English

Table 2: Precision of the Method Evaluated as Relative Standard Deviation at Different Concentration Levels of A2780 Cells.

English

Table 3: Association Between the Genes and Clinical Features.

English

Table 2: Average and Standard Deviation for the Fitted Parameters and Free Energy Obtained in 10 Independent Evolutionary Processes.

English

Table 1: Mean ± Standard Deviation From the Measurements Recorded.

English

Table 2: Summary of the Psychological Evaluation Results of the Final Sample of MS Patients and Normalised Data for the Portuguese Population (SD = Standard Deviation).

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy