Comparison of Identification of Soil Stratigraphy Between Two Code Methods of CPTU Test and Laboratory Test in Shanghai

doi 10.2991/iccte-16.2016.34
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Atlantis Press

Related search

Comparison of Two Whole System Test Methods: CCT and PLPE

2018English

Laboratory Test Methods for Sulfur Dewpoint Corrosion

Nippon Kinzoku Gakkaishi/Journal of the Japan Institute of Metals
Mechanics of MaterialsAlloysMaterials ChemistryCondensed Matter PhysicsMetals
1970English

Determination of Stratigraphy—Soil Types—Using Cone Penetration Test in Sedimentary Deposits in North-East of Argentina

Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection
2015English

Multiple True-False (MTF) and Multiple-Choice (MC) Test Formats: A Comparison Between Two Versions of the Same Test Paper of Iranian NUEE

Journal of Language Teaching and Research
2012English

Various Test Case Generation in Code Smell Detection Tools and Testing Methods: Review

International Journal of Computer Applications
2020English

Comparison of the Double Two-Step Test and the Maximal Exercise Treadmill Test: Studies in Coronary-Prone Subjects

Circulation
Cardiovascular MedicinePhysiologyCardiology
1967English

Laboratory Test Results

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Medicine
1978English

Comparison Between Organic Matter Content of Main Soil Orders in Kurdistan Region Using Two Different Methods.

Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences
AgriculturalBiological Sciences
2020English

Comparison of Open Essence Scent Identification Test Card and Conventional Olfaction Tests

Journal of Otolaryngology of Japan
Otorhinolaryngology
2011English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy