Is the Cumulative Live Birth Rate Following in Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Lower With Government Coverage Than Prior to Coverage?

International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology
doi 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184983
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Medip Academy

Related search

Previous Caesarean Section Is Associated With Lower Subsequent in Vitro Fertilization Live Birth Rates

Human Fertility
MedicineGynecologyReproductive MedicineObstetrics
2019English

Joint Impact of Maternal Age and BMI on Cumulative Live Birth Following in Vitro Fertilization

Fertility and Sterility
GynecologyReproductive MedicineObstetrics
2018English

Serum Progesterone Elevation Adversely Affects Cumulative Live Birth Rate in Different Ovarian Responders During in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer: A Large Retrospective Study

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2014English

Discordant Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) and Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Among Women Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization (IVF): Which One Is the Better Predictor for Live Birth?

Journal of Ovarian Research
GynecologyOncologyObstetrics
2018English

Microfluidic Technology for in Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

JMST Advances
2019English

In Vitro Fertilization (IVF): Where Are We Now?

Birth Defects Research
Developmental BiologyPediatricsChild HealthMutagenesisPerinatologyHealthToxicologyEmbryology
2018English

Incentives for Improving Birth Registration Coverage

2018English

The Critical Shoulder Angle: Acromial Coverage Is More Relevant Than Glenoid Inclination

Journal of Orthopaedic Research
OrthopedicsSports Medicine
2019English

Birthweight Outcomes for Minimum Stimulation in Vitro Fertilization (MIVF) Versus Conventional in Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

Fertility and Sterility
GynecologyReproductive MedicineObstetrics
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy