The Value of Epistemic Disagreement in Scientific Practice. The Case of Homo Floresiensis

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.02.002
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

The Discovery of Homo Floresiensis: Tales of the Hobbit

Nature
Multidisciplinary
2014English

Comment on "The Brain of LB1, Homo Floresiensis"

Science
MultidisciplinaryPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
2006English

Primate Brains, the ‘Island Rule’ and the Evolution of Homo Floresiensis

Journal of Human Evolution
EvolutionEcologySystematicsAnthropologyBehaviorEducation
2013English

Brain Size of Homo Floresiensis and Its Evolutionary Implications

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
GeneticsMolecular BiologyEnvironmental ScienceBiochemistryMicrobiology ImmunologyBiological SciencesMedicineAgricultural
2013English

Epistemic Dimensions of Gaslighting: Peer-Disagreement, Self-Trust, and Epistemic Injustice

Inquiry (United Kingdom)
Health PolicyPhilosophy
2019English

The Epistemic Value of Good Sense

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Philosophy of ScienceHistory
2012English

The Epistemic Value of Democratic Deliberation

2018English

Overcoming Disagreement Through Ordering: Building an Epistemic Hierarchy

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
2018English

Epistemic Stance Without Epistemic Modals: The Case of the Presumptive Future

Semantics and Linguistic Theory
2019English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy