Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Comparing Cost of Indwelling Pleural Catheter vs Talc Pleurodesis for Malignant Pleural Effusion

Chest - United States
doi 10.1378/chest.13-2481
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
CardiologyCritical CareCardiovascular MedicineIntensive Care MedicinePulmonaryRespiratory Medicine
Date

October 1, 2014

Authors
Erika D. PenzEleanor K. MishraHelen E. DaviesBraden J. MannsRobert F. MillerNajib M. Rahman
Publisher

Elsevier BV


Related search

Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) Trial: A Multicentre Randomised Study Comparing Indwelling Pleural Catheter Versus Talc Pleurodesis

BMJ Open
Medicine
2014English

P41 Indwelling Pleural Catheter or Talc Pleurodesis: Which Should We Favour?

2017English

P42 Establishing an Indwelling Pleural Catheter Service for Ambulatory Management of Symptomatic Malignant Pleural Effusion

2017English

P3.01-73 Talc Versus Minocycline and OK-432 Pleurodesis for Malignant Pleural Effusion.

Journal of Thoracic Oncology
MedicineOncologyRespiratory MedicinePulmonary
2018English

Review of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Survival After Talc Pleurodesis or Surgery

Journal of Thoracic Disease
PulmonaryRespiratory Medicine
2017English

Clinical Predictors of Successful and Earlier Pleurodesis With a Tunnelled Pleural Catheter in Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Cohort Study

CMAJ Open
2018English

Malignant Pleural Effusion

English

Malignant Pleural Effusion

2011English

Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion

2013English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy