Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Apple v. Pepper: Rationalizing Antitrust's Indirect Purchaser Rule

SSRN Electronic Journal
doi 10.2139/ssrn.3394939
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

January 1, 2019

Authors
Herbert Hovenkamp
Publisher

Elsevier BV


Related search

Improving the Legal Environment for Start-Up Financing by Rationalizing Rule 144

SSRN Electronic Journal
2004English

The Rule in Foss v Harbottle Is Dead; Long Live the Rule in Foss v Harbottle

SSRN Electronic Journal
2013English

Rationalizing Irrational Beliefs

Theoretical Economics Letters
2016English

British Indirect Rule and Islam in Northern Nigeria (1900-1940)

PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences
2018English

Rationalizing Antitrust Cluster Markets

Yale Law Journal
Law
1985English

On Rationalizing the Irrational

PS - Political Science and Politics
SociologyPolitical Science
1970English

Indirect Disjunctive Belief Rule Base Modeling Using Limited Conjunctive Rules: Two Possible Means

International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Applied MathematicsTheoretical Computer ScienceArtificial IntelligenceSoftware
2019English

Rationalizing the Fraud and Abuse Statute

Health Affairs
MedicineHealth Policy
1996English

Rationalizing the Drug Patent System

Health Affairs
MedicineHealth Policy
2001English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy