Erratum To: Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Versus Open Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer

Surgical Endoscopy - Germany
doi 10.1007/s00464-015-4545-7
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Surgery
Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

A Review of Outcomes and Technique for the Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer

Advances in Urology
GynecologyUrologyObstetrics
2018English

Erratum to Laparoscopic-Assisted Versus Open Abdominoperineal Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Annals of Surgical Oncology
OncologySurgery
2009English

Utility of Preoperative 3-D Simulation of Laparoscopic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: Surgical Outcomes of 10 Initial Cases

Asian journal of endoscopic surgery
Medicine
2018English

Results of Laparoscopic-Assisted vs. Open Surgery for Lower Rectal Cancer

Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi
2009English

Mp97-13 Association of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection With Thromboembolic Events and Lymphocele Formation Among Men Undergoing Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy With Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection

Journal of Urology
Urology
2017English

Laparoscopic Versus Open Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

2006English

Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

World Journal of Surgery
Surgery
2019English

Lymph Node Dissection for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy
Nuclear MedicineRadiologyImaging
2017English

Indication of Autonomic Nerve Preserving Operation for Rectal Cancer on Lateral Node Dissection.

Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi
2000English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy