Alternative Pork Carcass Evaluation Techniques: II. Statistical Analysis of Error Attributable to Sex, Genotype, and Weight.

Journal of Animal Science - United States
doi 10.2527/1995.733645x
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Related search

Pork Carcass Composition: II. Use of Indicator Cuts for Predicting Carcass Composition.

Journal of Animal Science
Animal ScienceZoologyGeneticsMedicineFood Science
1998English

Evaluation of the Quality Level of Carcass From the Aspect of Proportion of Major Carcass Parts in Pork Carcass Sides

Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry
2002English

Comparative Study of Pork Lipids According to Carcass Locations

Annales de Zootechnie
1985English

Commercial Adaptation of Ultrasonography to Predict Pork Carcass Composition From Live Animal and Carcass Measurements.

Journal of Animal Science
Animal ScienceZoologyGeneticsMedicineFood Science
1992English

Relative Contribution of Breed, Slaughter Weight, Sex and Diet to the Fatty Acid Composition of Differentiated Pork

Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Animal ScienceZoologyFood Animals
2016English

Quantitative Assessment of the Sources of Human Salmonellosis Attributable to Pork

1999English

The Effect of Age, Genotype and Sex on Carcass Traits, Meat Quality and Sensory Attributes of Geese

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Animal ScienceZoologyFood Science
2018English

Utilization of Roughage to Produce Heavy Pigs. Interactions Between Genotype, Sex and Management System. 1. - Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics

Annales de Zootechnie
1981English

Evaluation of Analysis by Cross-Validation. Part II: Diagnostic and Optimization of Analysis Error Covariance

2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy