Comparative Evaluation of Various Frequentist and Bayesian Non-Homogeneous Poisson Counting Models

Computational Statistics- Germany

doi 10.1007/s00180-016-0686-y

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Date

Authors

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

The Fractional Non-Homogeneous Poisson Process

Statistics and Probability Letters
UncertaintyStatisticsProbability
2017English

Corrigendum to “Frequentist and Bayesian Approaches to Data Analysis: Evaluation and Estimation”

Psychology Learning and Teaching
EducationPsychology
2020English

Relationship Between Bayesian and Frequentist Significance Indices

International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification
ControlStatisticsProbabilityCombinatoricsSimulationOptimizationDiscrete MathematicsModeling
2012English

A Note on Fiducial Model Averaging as an Alternative to Checking Bayesian and Frequentist Models

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
StatisticsProbability
2017English

A Selection Bias Conflict and Frequentist Versus Bayesian Viewpoints

American Statistician
MathematicsStatisticsUncertaintyProbability
2009English

Marginal Models for Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Frequentist and Bayesian Framework Using Rstan and CopulaREMADA

Archives of Public Health
EnvironmentalPublic HealthOccupational Health
2015English

Monthly Precipitation Modeling Using Bayesian Non-Homogeneous Hidden Markov Chain

Nordic Hydrology
Water ScienceTechnology
2018English

Bayesian Estimation of Non-Gaussian Stochastic Volatility Models

Journal of Mathematical Finance
2014English

Accounting for Individual‐specific Variation Inhabitat‐selection Studies: Efficient Estimation of Mixed‐effects Models Using Bayesian or Frequentist Computation

Journal of Animal Ecology
EvolutionEcologySystematicsAnimal ScienceBehaviorZoology
2019English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy