Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 3: Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Images of the Mouthpart Morphologies of the Three Grazer Species Used for This Study; (A) Micrasema Quadriloba, (B) Glossosoma Sp., and (C) Epeorus Sp.
doi 10.7717/peerj.6747/fig-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 3: Macrostylis Metallicola N. Sp. Paratype ♀ 301 (SMF 50945), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Images.
Figure 3: Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM).
Figure 4: Macrostylis Metallicola N. Sp. Paratype ♀ 959 (SMF 50948), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Images.
Figure 5: SEM (Scanning-Electron Microscopy) Images of the Posterior Maxillary Teeth (T12, T13) of a Male Mole Snake (A) Highlighting the Blade-Like Carina Along the Posterior Edge of T13 (B).
Figure 4: Scanning Electron Microscopy.
Figure 13: Macrostylis Metallicola N. Sp. Paratype ♂ 1242 (SMF 50942), Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (cLSM) Images.
Figure 5: Macrostylis Metallicola N. Sp. Holotype ♀ 879 (SMF 50941), Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (cLSM) Images.
Scanning Electron Microscopy of Neoechinorhynchus Sp. (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae), a Possible New Species of Intestinal Parasite of the Tallfin Croaker Micropogonias Altipinnis (Günther, 1864)
Parasitología latinoamericana
Learning and Developing Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Techniques for Biological Research
Impact
