Marginal Neutrality – Neutrality and the Margin of Appreciation in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights

doi 10.1163/9789004346901_008

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Date

Authors

Publisher

Brill | Nijhoff

Related search

An Analysis of the Exclusion of Evidence Obtained in Violation of Human Rights in Light of the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights

Tilburg Law Review
Law
2010English

The European Court of Human Rights and Domestic violence:Valiulienev.Lithuania

International Journal of Human Rights
LawSociologyPolitical Science
2014English

Foucault, the “Facts,” and the Fiction of Neutrality: Neutrality in Librarianship and Peer Review

Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship
2016English

European Court of Human Rights*

European Journal of Health Law
Health PolicyLaw
2017English

Duties of Reasonable Accommodation in Relation to Religion and the European Court of Human Rights: A Closer Look at the Prohibition of Discrimination, the Freedom of Religion and Related Duties of State Neutrality

Erasmus Law Review
2012English

Should the European Union Ratify the European Convention on Human Rights? Some Remarks on the Relations Between the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice

English

Independence of the Judges of the European Court of Human Rights

Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
2019English

International Surrogacy Before the European Court of Human Rights

Journal of Private International Law
LawInternational RelationsPolitical Science
2017English

The Supreme Court of Canada: Reaffirming the Norm Through the Veil of Constitutional Neutrality

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy