Poor Reporting of Scientific Leadership Information in Clinical Trial Registers

PLoS ONE- United States

doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0001610

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Date

Authors

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Related search

Scientific Leadership in Industry

Nature
Multidisciplinary
1932English

Clinical Trial Transparency: A Reassessment of Industry Compliance With Clinical Trial Registration and Reporting Requirements in the United States

BMJ Open
Medicine
2017English

The Reliability of Perinatal and Neonatal Mortality Rates: Differential Under-Reporting in Linked Professional Registers vs. Dutch Civil Registers

Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
Child HealthPediatricsPerinatologyEpidemiology
2001English

‘Clinical Trial’ or ‘Critical Trial’ – A Scientific Affront on Human Rights

Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research
2016English

Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trial Descriptors and Use of Structured Abstracts

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Medicine
1998English

The Insignificance of Significance in Scientific Reporting

Wilderness and Environmental Medicine
EnvironmentalPublic HealthOccupational HealthSports ScienceEmergency Medicine
2019English

Reporting Clinical Trial Results to Inform Providers, Payers, and Consumers

Health Affairs
MedicineHealth Policy
2005English

Development of EULAR Recommendations for the Reporting of Clinical Trial Extension Studies in Rheumatology

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
ImmunologyMolecular BiologyBiochemistryRheumatologyAllergyGenetics
2014English

Compliance With Mandatory Reporting of Clinical Trial Results on ClinicalTrials.gov: Cross Sectional Study

BMJ
2012English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy