Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Table S1: The Estimates and Their Associated 95% Credibility Interval [CI] Per Construct for Each Item of the Six Pain Catastrophizing Instruments

doi 10.7717/peerj.8643/supp-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Figure 2: Estimates and Associated 95% Credibility Intervals of the Relevance Score for Each of the Six Pain Catastrophizing Measures on Pain Catastrophizing.

English

Figure 1: Estimates and Associated 95% Credibility Intervals (CI) of the Relevance Score for the PCI (Worry About Pain), PVAQ (Pain Vigilance) and MPI (Affective Distress; Disability; Pain Severity) on Each Construct.

English

Table 1: The Five Highest and Lowest Scoring Pain Catastrophizing Items Across Pain Catastrophizing Measures.

English

Table 1: Anthropometric Sample Description (Mean and 95% CI).

English

Table 4: Estimates of the Associated Parameter Tested for Each Covariate With the P Value of the Associated Permutation Test.

English

Table 4: Prevalence (%), 95% Confidence Interval and Sample Size (N)) of Each Pathogen From the Stray Cats in the Six Studied Districts (Letter Inside the Parentheses Indicates the CCA of Each District; H-High, L-Low).

English

Fig. S2: Individual Survival Curves for Each Pooled Feed Group, Including 95% CI

English

Supplemental Information 1: Table S1. Summary of the Sequencing Depth for Each Sample.

English

Table 2: Percent (%) Variance Accounted for (95% CI) Using Different Types of Models.

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy