Methodological Requirements to Test a Possible In-Group Advantage in Judging Emotions Across Cultures: Comment on Elfenbein and Ambady (2002) and Evidence.

Psychological Bulletin - United States
doi 10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.236
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

American Psychological Association (APA)

Related search

Theory/Analysis Mismatch: Comment on Fredrickson and Joiner’s (2002) Test of the Broaden-And-Build Theory of Positive Emotions

Journal of Happiness Studies
Social Sciences
2007English

Reply to Sauter and Eisner: Differences Outweigh Commonalities in the Communication of Emotions Across Human Cultures

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Multidisciplinary
2013English

Validity Problems Comparing Values Across Cultures and Possible Solutions.

Psychological Methods
Philosophy of SciencePsychologyHistory
1997English

Emotions on Trial: Judging Crimes of Honour in Post-Civil-War Greece

Crime, Histoire & Sociétés
2006English

Judging the Evidence

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
2006English

Comment on Two Methodological Aspects

2020English

Methodological Review of Studies on Educational Leaders and Emotions (1992-2012)

Journal of Educational Administration
EducationPublic Administration
2017English

Methodological Requirements on Empirical Research Papers

Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems
2015English

The Two Cultures of ‘Biopolitics’: Comment in Response to Liesen and Walsh

Politics and the Life Sciences
Public AdministrationSociologySocial SciencesPolitical Science
2013English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy