Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 3: The Differences in Bacteria Community Diversity and Richness Indexes Among Different Feeding Treatment.
doi 10.7717/peerj.7462/fig-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 4: Bacterial Community Diversity at the Different Sites.
Figure 3: Zooplankton Species Richness in Lakes With Different Mictic Types (Epilimnion Only).
Figure 2: Depth-Related Patterns in Microbial Richness and Diversity.
Figure 4: Spatial Autocorrelation of Troglobitic Species Composition, Species Richness, Rarity-Weighted Richness and Phylogenetic Diversity Across Different Spatial Scales.
Figure 3: Carabid Beetle Species Richness (A) and Community Weighted Mean Body Size Within the Carabid Assemblages (B) for the Four Different Pitfall Trap Types.
Chimaeric Load Among Sympatric Social Bacteria Increases With Genotype Richness
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Genetics
Molecular Biology
Environmental Science
Biochemistry
Microbiology
Immunology
Biological Sciences
Medicine
Agricultural
Bacterial Community Diversity and Screening of Growth-Affecting Bacteria From Isochrysis Galbana Following Antibiotic Treatment
Frontiers in Microbiology
Microbiology
Species Richness, Biomass and Diversity of Macroalgal Assemblages in Tidepools of Different Sizes
Marine Ecology - Progress Series
Evolution
Ecology
Systematics
Aquatic Science
Behavior
Figure 3: Spatial Distribution of the Zooplankton Richness in the Barycz River.
