Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 9: Representing the Functional Differences at the Metabolism Level Between the Three Groups.
doi 10.7717/peerj.4390/fig-9
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 1: Morphological Differences Between the Three Sympatric Species of Haemulon.
Figure 4: Graphic Representation and Mean Differences of PVL Model Parameters in the Three Groups of Participants.
Figure 9: The Associated Microbiota of Fish Prey (Zooplankton Only) at the Genus Level in Teletskoye Lake.
Figure 5: The Relationship Between Genetic Distance (Figure 3) and the Accumulation of Morphometric Differences (Table 4) Between the Major Subspecific Groups That Might Hybridize Due to Proximity.
Figure 3: The Three Mesozooplankton Community Composition Groups From Cluster Analysis (A) at 50% Similarity. The Mean Mesozooplankton Community Composition (%, ±S.D.) for the Three Groups From Cluster Analysis (B).
Figure 9: Graphical Representation of Security Durability Impact at Level 3.
Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Functional Groups
RSC Drug Discovery Series
Drug Discovery
Differences in Monoterpene Emission Characteristics After Ozone Exposure Between Three Clones Representing Major Gene Pools of Cryptomeria Japonica
J. AGRICULTURAL METEOROLOGY
Agronomy
Crop Science
Atmospheric Science
Identification of Functional Signatures in the Metabolism of the Three Cellular Domains of Life
PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
