Whose Decision? Negotiating Epistemic and Deontic Rights in Medical Treatment Decisions

Journal of Pragmatics - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.007
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Process Modelling Using Fuzzy Epistemic and Deontic Logics

Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series
2017English

Headline Judgments in English-Speaking Mass-Media Texts: Epistemic Modality, Deontic Modality, Evidentiality

Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology
2018English

Epistemic Considerations of Decision Making in Games

Mathematical Social Sciences
SociologyPsychologyProbabilityUncertaintyStatisticsPolitical ScienceSocial Sciences
1999English

Explanations for Side Effect Aversion in Preventive Medical Treatment Decisions.

Health Psychology
MedicinePsychiatryMental HealthApplied Psychology
2009English

Decision Aids for People Facing Health Treatment or Screening Decisions

2011English

Negotiating Disagreement in Picture Symbol Supported Decision Making

Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders
LinguisticsSpeechLanguageHearing
2015English

Consensual Decision-Making Among Epistemic Peers

SSRN Electronic Journal
2009English

Automation in Local Public Libraries—Whose Decision?

The Australian Library Journal
1984English

Whose Future Is It? Ethical Family Decision Making About Daughters’ Treatment in the Oncofertility Context

Cancer Treatment and Research
MedicineCancer ResearchOncology
2010English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy