Avoiding the Common Wisdom Fallacy: The Role of Social Sciences in Constitutional Adjudication

SSRN Electronic Journal
doi 10.2139/ssrn.1923012
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Foreword: Transparent Adjudication and Social Science Research in Constitutional Criminal Procedure

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Law
2000English

Culture (And Religion) in Constitutional Adjudication

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
LawSociologyPolitical Science
2017English

Severability, Remedies, and Constitutional Adjudication

SSRN Electronic Journal
2014English

Civic Virtue and the Feminine Voice in Constitutional Adjudication

Virginia Law Review
Law
1986English

Remedial Discretion in Constitutional Adjudication: A Codicil

SSRN Electronic Journal
2018English

Beard and Holmes on Constitutional Adjudication

SSRN Electronic Journal
2014English

Remaking Constitutional Tradition at the Margin of the Empire: The Creation of Legislative Adjudication in Colonial New York

Law and History Review
LawHistory
1998English

On Gamya-Gamaka-Bhava and Its Negative Form in the Method of Avoiding the Fallacy of Anaikantika-Hetu

JOURNAL OF INDIAN AND BUDDHIST STUDIES (INDOGAKU BUKKYOGAKU KENKYU)
1992English

Role of Institutes of Social Sciences in Enhancing the Quality of Postgraduate Education

Journal of Higher Education and Science
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy