In Defense of Real Cartesian Motion: A Reply to Lennon

Journal of the History of Philosophy - United States
doi 10.1353/hph.2015.0067
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Philosophy
Date
Authors
Publisher

Project Muse

Related search

In Reply: In Defense of Succinylcholine

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
MedicineAnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2016English

Correspondence: Reply to ‘Chimpanzee Helping Is Real, Not a Byproduct’

Nature Communications
AstronomyGeneticsMolecular BiologyBiochemistryChemistryPhysics
2018English

An Illusory Motion of a Stationary Target During Head Motion Is Unaffected by Paradoxical Retinal Motion: A Reply to Shebilske and Proffitt (1983)

Perception & Psychophysics
1983English

Ana-Maria Lennon-Duménil

Current Biology
GeneticsMolecular BiologyBiochemistryBiological SciencesNeuroscienceAgricultural
2019English

Reply to Lages and Heron: Binocular 3D Motion Estimation

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Multidisciplinary
2008English

The Value of Flexibility in Adapting to Climate Change: A Real Options Analysis of Investments in Coastal Defense

Climate Change Economics
Planetary ChangeManagementMonitoringEconomicsGlobalPolicyLawEconometrics
2012English

Reply to Comment on ‘Lorentz Transformations With Arbitrary Line of Motion’

European Journal of Physics
AstronomyPhysics
2007English

Omitted-Variable Bias and Other Matters in the Defense of the Category Adjustment Model: A Reply to Crawford (2019)

SSRN Electronic Journal
2019English

Issues in Vendor/Library Relations-Hitler and Lennon

Against the Grain
2013English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy