Effectiveness of Posterior Decompression Techniques Compared With Conventional Laminectomy for Lumbar Stenosis

European Spine Journal - Germany
doi 10.1007/s00586-015-4098-4
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Endoscopic Posterior Decompression of Lumbar Canal Stenosis

Indian Journal of Neurosurgery
2013English

Effectiveness of Single Posterior Decompressive Laminectomy in Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study

Turkish Neurosurgery
SurgeryNeurology
2011English

Minimally Invasive Decompression Versus Open Laminectomy for Central Stenosis of the Lumbar Spine: Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Study

British Medical Journal
Medicine
2015English

Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Posterior Decompression for Lumbar Canal Stenosis.

Orthopedics & Traumatology
1993English

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach Versus Instrumented Total Laminectomy and Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Turkish Neurosurgery
SurgeryNeurology
2018English

Outcome After Surgery of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Comparison of Bilateral Laminotomy, Trumpet Laminectomy, and Conventional Laminectomy

Frontiers in Surgery
Surgery
2016English

Surgical Results Using Only Posterior Decompression for Lumbar Canal Stenosis With Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis(Topics of Therapy for Spine Surgery)

Japanese Journal of Neurosurgery
SurgeryNeurology
2012English

Complications Associated With Microscopic Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Laminectomy for Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis

Spinal Surgery
2015English

Mid-Term Results of Posterior Decompression for Spinal Stenosis Due to Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Spinal Surgery
2009English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy